▼ Not recommended
0 hrs
My score: 3/10
I'm so, so sorry to give a "not recommended" to this game. The fact that it's free to play and an obvious passion project isn't enough to mitigate the abundance of baffling problems it has. First off: this is supposed to be a virtual art exhibition, right? So, why choose this grainy, opaque, dull artstyle? Most of the artpieces are barely visible as a result. Second: the exploration is confusing, disorienting, buggy. The layouts don't make sense, and yet there's no feeling of wonder or surprise - just frustration trying to reach something. It has almost no sound design (except for a few of the art installations that have music, the whole thing makes you wonder if your speakers are working), and overall no "gameplay". Listen, I know this is supposed to be an experience more than a game, but it's simply something I did not enjoy. I'm no game developer but I can think about at least 5 ways to make a virtual exhibition space more interesting, enjoyable and valorasing for the artists involved.
BUT: I'm all for the Art. I noticed the developer is very active and seemingly a nice person, so I promise to come back to the game every once in while to see if it gets better, and change my review accordingly.
[*]
[*]
[*]
[*]
[*]
[*]
Overview
I'm so, so sorry to give a "not recommended" to this game. The fact that it's free to play and an obvious passion project isn't enough to mitigate the abundance of baffling problems it has. First off: this is supposed to be a virtual art exhibition, right? So, why choose this grainy, opaque, dull artstyle? Most of the artpieces are barely visible as a result. Second: the exploration is confusing, disorienting, buggy. The layouts don't make sense, and yet there's no feeling of wonder or surprise - just frustration trying to reach something. It has almost no sound design (except for a few of the art installations that have music, the whole thing makes you wonder if your speakers are working), and overall no "gameplay". Listen, I know this is supposed to be an experience more than a game, but it's simply something I did not enjoy. I'm no game developer but I can think about at least 5 ways to make a virtual exhibition space more interesting, enjoyable and valorasing for the artists involved.
BUT: I'm all for the Art. I noticed the developer is very active and seemingly a nice person, so I promise to come back to the game every once in while to see if it gets better, and change my review accordingly.
Key Points
[*]
DIFFICULTY:
None, it's just confusing and boring.[*]
PRESENTATION:
Very problematic considering what it wants to be.[*]
STORY:
None.[*]
GAMEPLAY/GAMEPLAY LOOP:
None. You just walk. There's no goal.[*]
TECHNICAL POLISH:
Rough around the edges.[*]
MONEYxCONTENT VALUE:
It's free if you want to take a look, but it's not an enjoyable experience in my opinion.
10 found helpful
Steam ↗